Masthead banner of Park Science: Integrating Research and Resource Management in the National Parks; ISSN 1090-9966; link to current issue
Volume 26
Number 1
Spring 2009
Arrowhead symbol of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior
Home + About + Author Guidelines + Archive + Subscribe +  
Locator map of contaminant sampling sites in Mount Revelstoke National Park, Yoho National Park, and Observation Peak in Banff National Park (British Columbia and Alberta, Canada). (Cartography by John N. Westgate) Physical Sciences
Organic pollutant distribution in Canadian mountain parks

By Gillian Daly and Frank Wania
Published: 4 Sep 2015 (online)  •  14 Sep 2015 (in print)
Contaminant hot spots
Management implications and research opportunities
About the authors
+ PDF +
Photo of mountains and pond in western Canada.

Courtesy of Hang Xiao

Figure 1. The mountains of western Canada provide valuable freshwater and forest resources as well as cherished recreational opportunities.

MOUNTAIN ENVIRONMENTS ARE IMPORTANT sources of freshwater and forest resources, contain areas of high biodiversity, and provide cherished recreational opportunities (fig. 1, above). Conservation of these resources and functions is the central objective of national parks in mountain regions. While some threats facing mountain environments, such as unsustainable use of natural resources and deforestation, can be avoided in national parks, other threats, such as climate change and chemical contamination, are more difficult to counter. Because of the large variability of environmental conditions in high-relief environments—caused by varying elevation and exposure—contaminant distribution within mountain regions is expected to be highly variable. Recent research in western Canadian mountain parks has provided new insight into the location of organic contaminant concentrations, and thus where exposure of organisms to those contaminants may be greatest. This insight can help park managers identify key hot spots—areas of elevated contaminant exposure—and communicate risks to the public (e.g., fish advisories). Identification of likely hot spots can also aid in the design of future research programs aimed at evaluating the ecotoxicological impact of elevated contaminant concentrations.

Return to top

This page updated:  9 July 2009

Page 1 of 6 • Next +
From the Guest Editor(s)
In This Issue
Information Crossfile
Book Reviews
Masthead Information
The Canon National Parks Science Scholars Program: A legacy of science for national parks
Science for parks / parks for science: Conservation-based research in national parks
The rock and ice problem in national parks: An opportunity for monitoring climate change impacts
1,000 feet above a coral reef: A seascape approach to designing marine protected areas
Management strategies for keystone bird species: The Magellanic woodpecker in Nahuel Huapi National Park, Argentina
Climate change and water supply in western national parks
Mercury in snow at Acadia National Park reveals watershed dynamics
  Organic pollutant distribution in Canadian mountain parks
Building an NPS training program in interpretation through distance learning
Musical instruments in the pre-Hispanic Southwest
Societal dynamics in grizzly bear conservation: Vulnerabilities of the ecosystem-based management approach
Linking wildlife populations with ecosystem change: State-of-the-art satellite ecology for national-park science
Whale sound recording technology as a tool for assessing the effects of boat noise in a Brazilian marine park
Related Publications + Explore Nature + + Privacy + Disclaimer + Contact Editor
Web Site Last Updated: 16 September 2015