Masthead banner of Park Science: Integrating Research and Resource Management in the National Parks; ISSN 1090-9966; link to current issue
Volume 28
Number 3
Winter 2011-2012
Arrowhead symbol of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior
Home + About + Author Guidelines + Archive + Subscribe +  
Pack stock grazing in Lyell Canyon, Yosemite National Park, California Park Operations
Managing overnight stock use at Yosemite National Park
A science-based approach
By J. Dan Abbe and Liz Ballenger
Published: 4 Sep 2015 (online)  •  14 Sep 2015 (in print)
Determining grazing capacities
Future planning
About the authors
+ PDF +

Pack stock have been part of the history of Yosemite National Park, California, since the mid-1800s, and they continue to play vital roles in wilderness recreation and park operations. Releasing stock for grazing in meadows is a common practice for overnight stock users (figs. 1 and 2); however, grazing and trampling can negatively affect meadows by decreasing vegetation cover and productivity, shifting plant species composition, damaging streambanks, exposing bare ground, compacting soil, and increasing erosion (Miller and Donart 1981; Kauffman and Krueger 1984; McClaran and Cole 1993; Olson-Rutz et al. 1996; Cole et al. 2004). A recent study in Yosemite identified impacts on subalpine meadows linked to stock use (Ballenger et al. 2010). Park staff is addressing this issue through a science-based pilot stock management program that monitors use levels and area conditions and recommends best management practices to mitigate resource damage. Because commercial pack trips account for approximately half of overnight stock use in Yosemite, the park has used the Commercial Use Authorization (CUA) permit as an interim management tool, as it gives the park superintendent discretion to establish specific terms and conditions of use.

Pack stock grazing at Dorothy Lake, July 2010, Yosemite National Park.

NPS/Erin Babich

Figure 1. Pack stock graze at Dorothy Lake, July 2010, Yosemite National Park.

Pack stock at Emeric Lake in Yosemite, August 2006.

NPS Photo

Figure 2. Pack stock at Emeric Lake in Yosemite, August 2006.

The pilot stock management program focuses on Lyell and Virginia canyons, northeast of Yosemite Valley, where approximately half of the park’s commercial stock use occurs. We chose these sites because of high use levels and impacts compared with other areas, diversity of the two areas, and relatively easy access for monitoring. In August 2009, an interdisciplinary team of park biologists, wilderness managers, and trail maintenance staff visited both areas to observe and discuss pack stock issues in the field. As a result the team developed recommendations for management actions, some of which were implemented following management approval the following season. For example, in 2010, Yosemite designated stock camps and holding areas in Virginia and Lyell canyons, identified access routes to and from the camps, and clarified locations of grazing areas. Packers are expected to use the depicted access routes and camp locations, which we provide in the form of maps with GIS locations, as a condition of their CUA permit. The number of sites where stock are permitted was reduced and may help decrease the amount of grazing in meadows until science-based grazing limits can be established.

Return to top

This page updated:  6 February 2012

Page 1 of 5 • Next +
From the Guest Editor(s)
A Wilderness Celebration
At Your Service
Masthead Information
Special Issue: Wilderness Stewardship and Science
A conversation with NPS Director Jonathan B. Jarvis
Using wilderness character to improve wilderness stewardship
Using the “Keeping It Wild” framework to develop a wilderness character monitoring protocol for the Otis Pike Fire Island High Dune Wilderness
Lessons learned: Merging process elements to address wilderness character and user capacity
A database application for wilderness character monitoring
Fires in wilderness in the national parks
Transboundary cooperation to achieve wilderness protection and large landscape conservation
Integrating cultural resources and wilderness character
Climate change: Wilderness’s greatest challenge
Climate change threatens wilderness integrity
The science of trail surveys
Wilderness visitor experiences
Scientific study and enduring wilderness
The hidden consequences of fire suppression
Using acoustical data to manage for solitude in wilderness areas
Creating exploratory maps for wilderness impact surveys: Applications in campsite searches
Spiritual outcomes of wilderness experience
Remote sensing of heritage resources for research and management
  Managing overnight stock use at Yosemite National Park
Economic impacts of search-and-rescue operations on wilderness management in the national parks
Through the looking glass: What value will we see in wilderness in 2064?
Related Publications + Explore Nature + + Privacy + Disclaimer + Contact Editor
Web Site Last Updated: 16 September 2015