Masthead banner of Park Science: Integrating Research and Resource Management in the National Parks; ISSN 1090-9966; link to current issue
Volume 29
Number 2
Fall/Winter 2012-2013
Arrowhead symbol of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior
Home + About + Author Guidelines + Archive + Subscribe +  
Case Studies
Published: 15 Jan 2014 (online)  •  30 Jan 2014 (in print)
Articles
 
Resource-conflict analysis: A geospatial approach to assessing energy development threats to landscapes in the Southwest
  Sidebar: Data sources
Exploring the fuel efficiency of oversnow vehicles in Yellowstone National Park
Sidebar: Need for special rule to authorize oversnow vehicle use
+ PDF +
Case Study
Sidebar: Data sources

Once we had developed the list of potential cross-boundary resource conflicts summarized in table 1 we identified and harvested corresponding geospatial data from the following readily available data sources:

  • “Streets” GIS layer, ESRI (Economic and Social Research Institute) Map and Data DVD, dated 2005.
  • National Land Cover Database (2006). U.S. Geological Survey. Available at http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd2006.php.
  • National Park Service. 2011. NPScape Upstream Watershed Delineation Processing SOP. Upstream Watershed Analysis for Select National Park Units. National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA. Available at https://irma.nps.gov/Reference.mvc/Profile?Code=2173077.
  • National Hydrography Dataset—NHDPlus. U.S. Geological Survey. Available at http://www.horizon-systems.com
    /nhdplus
    .
  • State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) Database, May/2011. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Available at http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/USDGSM.aspx.
  • National Wetlands Inventory (NWI). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Available at http://wetlands.fws.gov.
  • Critical Habitat Portal. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Downloaded 3 August 2011 at http://criticalhabitat.fws.gov
    /crithab/
    .
  • Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US), version 1.2. U.S. Geological Survey, Gap Analysis Program. Available at http://www.protectedlands.net.
  • Theobald, D. M. 2010. Estimating natural landscape changes from 1992 to 2030 in the conterminous U.S. Landscape Ecology 25:999–1011.
  • Theobald, D. M., S. E. Reed, K. Fields, and M. Soulé. 2012. Connecting natural landscapes using a landscape permeabil­ity model to prioritize conservation activities in the United States. Conservation Letters 5(2):123–133.
  • Defense Meteorological Satellite Program. NOAA National Geographic Data Center, Earth Observation Group. Available from http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/dmsp.
  • National Elevation Dataset (NED) 30-meter digital elevation model (DEM). Available at http://ned.usgs.gov/.

Many of these data sources needed to be used in combination to derive useful information for the resource conflict analysis. For example, the NPScape landscape dynamics monitoring project supplied roads data for use in conjunction with National Land Cover data to determine roadless natural areas. Likewise, NPScape data coupled with National Hydrography Data Sets allowed us to delineate upstream watersheds. We combined STATSGO soils data and digital elevation models with the logic of BLM’s Mojave and Central Basin and Range Rapid Ecoregional Assessments (REAs) to obtain wind and water erosion potential. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wetlands and critical habitat for threatened and endangered species were used to identify habitats of concern. We evaluated habitat quality and landscape connectivity through data from two research-based Naturalness and Landscape Permeability data sets. The Protected Areas Database of the United States facilitated our understanding of landownership of various protected areas. Finally, we performed a GIS analysis of potential visual resource impairments that included ambient light pollution measurements from a nighttime lights data set.

Return to top


– Previous • Page 2 of 4 • Next +
Departments
 
From the Editor
Information Crossfile
Masthead Information
FEATURES
 
Using landscape patterns, climate projections, and species distribution models to map future potential habitats for desert tortoise, Shivwits milk-vetch, and American pika in Zion National Park, Utah
New recreational water testing alternatives
Resource-conflict analysis: A geospatial approach to assessing energy development threats to landscapes in the Southwest
  Sidebar: Data sources
Exploring the fuel efficiency of oversnow vehicles in Yellowstone National Park
Sidebar: Need for special rule to authorize oversnow vehicle use
Enhancing native plant habitat in a restored salt marsh on Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Improving National Park Service partnerships: A gap analysis of external partners
A system-wide assessment of night resources and night recreation in the U.S. national parks: A case for expanded definitions
Related Publications + Explore Nature + NPS.gov + Privacy + Disclaimer + Contact Editor
Web Site Last Updated: 17 January 2014