Masthead banner of Park Science: Integrating Research and Resource Management in the National Parks; ISSN 1090-9966; link to current issue
Volume 26
Number 3
Winter 2009-2010
Arrowhead symbol of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior
Home + About + Author Guidelines + Archive + Subscribe +  
Helicopter air tour over Haleakala Crater, Haleakla National Park. NPS Photo. Research Report
Aircraft overflights at national parks: Conflict and its potential resolution
By Paul A. Bell, Britton L. Mace, and Jacob A. Benfield
Published: 15 Jan 2014 (online)  •  30 Jan 2014 (in print)
Pages
 
Abstract
  Introduction
Psychology of noise
References
About the authors
+ PDF +
Introduction
Helicopter air tour over Haleakala Crater, Haleakla National Park.

NPS Photo

The National Park Service works with the Federal Aviation Administration to develop air tour management plans for units of the National Park System that have commercial air tours. Though no air tour management plans have been implemented yet, a few parks have made progress toward reducing noise and visual intrusions. At Haleakala National Park (Hawaii), for example, air tour operators honor a voluntary agreement to not fly within the crater rim. The photo depicts the historical flight path that no longer occurs here.

THE TOURIST ATTRACTION KNOWN AS AYERS ROCK, OR ULURU, in central Australia has undergone remarkable management transformation over the last 25 years. In 1959, experienced bush pilots would bank their single-engine planes tightly around the large rock monolith and turn the aircraft so that passengers had a scenic view of the deep erosion in the red sandstone, just before touching down on the desert landing strip at the base of the massive formation. Thousands of other tourists would follow over the next 25 years, many of them climbing the trail to the top of the monolith and staying in commercial lodging at its base. In 1985 the land was returned to the local Anangu people and then leased to the government as a jointly managed park, known today as Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park. Out of respect for the spiritual significance of Uluru to the Anangu people, the airstrip and lodgings at the base of the monolith have been replaced by a modern airport and Yulara Resort outside the park, but the airstrip is still visible in satellite photos even though it is unused and covered with scattered desert flora. Commercial jet aircraft deliver tourists to the new airport, and as they engage in the popular activity of viewing the sunset over the rock formations, noisy helicopters fly other tourists over the terrain. Climbing the formation is still permitted but discouraged, also out of respect for its spiritual significance. In what would come as a surprise to many in park management in other parts of the world, the nearby visitor center at Yulara has a display actually encouraging tourists to take a helicopter tour of Uluru rather than climb it, again as a sign of respecting its spiritual significance.

This rather unusual circumstance is but one example of the many conflicts park managers encounter when faced with multiple mandates of preserving nature and facilitating visitor enjoyment of parks. These conflicts are especially apparent when it comes to dealing with aircraft overflights, wherein the interests of tourists on the ground (such as backcountry hikers) vs. those in the air, air tour operators vs. whitewater rafting outfitters, and military and commercial entities and safety authorities vs. visitors who want to listen to nature are regularly at odds. Yet, there is hope for at least some degree of resolution to these conflicts.

Commercial aircraft flights are increasingly common. Miller (2008) shows how 3,435 jet departures in one hour in October 2000 essentially overlay the entire United States with their flight paths. Such flights are so common that on 11 September 2001, backcountry hikers knew that something had gone very wrong because there were no sounds from overflights. Diverting commercial flights around national parks raises economic issues for operators and safety issues from altering flight paths. These aircraft are high enough by the time they get over most national parks that they yield less noise than tourist aircraft, but visitors do notice them and they can interfere with some activities (e.g., Williams 2007). Noise may be louder for parks close to a commercial or military airfield.

More common in many parks are overflights from air tours—mostly helicopters or smaller propeller-driven planes that fly low for the view and thus generate louder and more disturbing sounds for those on the ground. These overflights represent a type of conflict derived from multiple-use mandates wherein the enjoyment by one type of visitor comes at the expense of enjoyment by visitors who want a different type of experience. The beauty and expanse of many national parks are particularly spectacular viewed from a tourist aircraft, and for some with disabilities air tours are the only realistic means of accessing the splendid scenery of the backcountry. The popularity of such flights makes them very profitable for operators and contributes to the local economy. A 1996 study of Grand Canyon air tours departing out of Las Vegas, for example, estimated that air tours contributed $504 million to the southern Nevada economy, and that if the tours were eliminated, some $249 million would be lost from tourists who would not visit southern Nevada (Schwer et al. 2000).

Commercial aircraft flights … are so common that on 11 September 2001, backcountry hikers knew that something had gone very wrong because there were no sounds from overflights.

The noise from such air tours, however, is considerable. Horonjeff et al. (1993) obtained baseline information about the intensity and duration of aircraft noise in three national parks. Measurements made at 23 separate locations in Grand Canyon National Park found aircraft sound levels as high as 76 dB(A).¹ By way of comparison, 35 dB(A) is typical of a quiet residential neighborhood at night; the crater at Haleakala National Park is 10 dB(A) in the absence of external sounds; crickets at 5 meters (16 ft) distance in Zion National Park are 40 dB(A), and a snowcoach at 30 meters (98 ft) in Yellowstone National Park is 80 dB(A) (Ambrose and Burson 2004). (See table 1 to compare the volume of park, urban, and other sounds.) Aircraft noise is audible 79% of the time in some Grand Canyon areas, with as many as 43 separate aircraft noise events occurring within every 20-minute interval. Tour overflights in the Grand Canyon increased from 40,000 in 1987 (Kanamine 1997) to approximately 55,000 in 2005 (Elrod and Joly 2006). On the busiest days, more than 100 helicopters may be in the airspace above the Grand Canyon at any given time. Furthermore, a number of the measured locations in the Grand Canyon produced interesting echo phenomena, where it was possible for a single aircraft to sound as if three or four aircraft were present, even without the aircraft being visible. Aircraft noise can echo up to 16 miles along the inner walls of the canyon (Kanamine 1997). Not a single location recorded in Grand Canyon National Park is totally free of aircraft noise (Mace et al. 2004).

¹ The volume of sounds is often measured in decibels, or dB. Volume or loudness is a psychological experience of the sound pressure, which corresponds to the energy in sound waves as measured in microbars. The human range of audible sound pressures is 0.0002 to 2,000 microbars. The decibel scale, with a range of 0 to 140 dB, is a logarithmic function of microbars such that an increase of 20 decibels represents a tenfold increase in pressure. Thus, a sound of 80 dB is 100 times (102) as intense as a 40 dB sound. Because different frequencies in the sound spectrum have different perceived loudness at the same pressure level, the A, B, and C decibel scales weight the frequencies differently, with the A scale being most common.

Return to top

This page updated:  29 December 2009
URL: http://www.nature.nps.gov/ParkScience/index.cfm?ArticleID=349&Page=1



Page 1 of 4 • Next +
Departments
 
From the Guest Editor(s)
Comments and Corrections
At Your Service
Information Crossfile
Profile
Science Notes
Field Moment
Meetings of Interest
Masthead Information
FEATURES
 
From landscapes to soundscapes: Introduction to the special issue
Measuring and monitoring soundscapes in the national parks
Integrating soundscapes into National Park Service planning
Excerpt from Governors Island General Management Plan
Conserving the wild life therein--Protecting park fauna from anthropogenic noise
Soundscapes monitoring and an overflight advisory group: Informing real-time management decisions at Denali
Soundscape management at Grand Canyon National Park
Tools of the trade: An example of using spectrograms to count fixed-wing aircraft
Visually impaired students help collect acoustic data in Grand Canyon National Park
Protecting the acoustic conditions at Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve
Generator noise along the U.S.-Mexico border
Airport expansion adjacent to San Antonio Missions
A program of research to support management of visitor-caused noise at Muir Woods National Monument
Modeling and mapping hikers’ exposure to transportation noise in Rocky Mountain National Park
  Aircraft overflights at national parks: Conflict and its potential resolution
Managing the natural soundscape: The National Park Service as a learning organization
Related Publications + Explore Nature + NPS.gov + Privacy + Disclaimer + Contact Editor
Web Site Last Updated: 17 January 2014