|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Partnerships have become an essential tool for carrying out the mission of the National Park Service. Park managers are increasingly working with neighboring communities, state and federal agencies, corporations, nongovernmental organizations, and universities to deal with a wide range of issues and maximize limited resources. For example, they understand that effectively addressing watershed management and protection, the spread of exotic plants and animals, or the recovery of endangered or declining species involves working cooperatively with myriad partners, from state agencies and private landowners to university researchers and committed volunteers. In addition to tackling resource threats coming from outside park boundaries, managers seek partnerships with other institutions and individuals to realize the unparalleled value of the parks for learning and scientific research. Partnerships also recognize that two heads are better than one, and as the articles in this chapter demonstrate, frontline park managers are developing the expertise to build successful long-term relationships that result in tangible benefits to both the parks and their partners. The administration also values the vitality of cooperative efforts for resource protection; in 2003 it launched the Cooperative Conservation Initiative, ushering in a new era for partnerships in the parks. The parks play an essential role in the social and economic fabric of the nation, and partnerships for cooperative conservation are an explicit recognition of this evolving reality.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
The National Park Service holds one or more active memorandums of understanding with 11 countries: Argentina, the Bahamas, Canada, Chile, China, Gabon, Hungary, Italy, Mexico, Poland, and Venezuela. One of the most important aspects of the agreement between the United States and Mexico is empowering local land managers from both countries to exchange information and work together. Because of this, scientific and technical exchange and coordination on natural resource management have increased among staff and managers of the natural protected areas. |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|