Natural Resource Year in Review—2002, A portrait of the year in natural resource stewardship and science in the National Park System, ISSN 1544-5437
Chapter00—Front Matter
Chapter03—Building on the Challenge
Chapter02—Citizen Scientists
Chapter03—Scientific Information for Management
Chapter04—Taking Stock of Biodiversity
Chapter05—Marine and Coastal Resource Preservation
Chapter06—Assessing and Managing Threats
Chapter07—Restoration
Chapter08—Looking Ahead
Chapters
Scientific Information for Management
Introduction
DNA sampling key to noninvasive study of mountain lions in southwestern parks
Global environmental effects on the mountain ecosystem at Glacier National Park
Soils inventory unearths new species at Great Smoky Mountains National Park
Sound signatures may provide clues to the health of park ecosystems
Horseshoe crab monitoring at Cape Cod National Seashore
CESUs in the Intermountain Region: Integrating natural and cultural resource research, technical assistance, and education
Park Flight: Connecting people and protected areas through technical exchange
Other Developments
Monitoring glacier change in the North Cascades
Award-Winner Profile: Tonnessen finds success as CESU coordinator
Elk effects and management considerations studied at Rocky Mountain
Partnership Profile: A model for international conservation of birds
Survey adds to understanding of ancient life-forms
Monitoring and preserving dark skies
Cape Hatteras fossil aids scientific understanding
Complete Article List
Utilities Home
Home
Current Issue
Who's Involved
Archive of Natural Resource Year in Review
Search
Contact Year in Review
Elk effects and management considerations studied at Rocky Mountain by Therese Johnson
Visitors viewing elk herd at Rocky Mountain National Park, CO; Copyright Karl Cordova

Elk management in Rocky Mountain National Park (Colorado) is a complex issue that has concerned park managers and the public for many decades. Elk migrate outside the park seasonally, necessitating a regional management approach among various agencies responsible for land and wildlife management, each with its own objectives and management constraints. The issue is complicated by interactions among multiple natural resources and the residual impacts of historical land use and wildlife management practices. It is controversial because of value conflicts among stakeholders regarding desirable elk numbers and the acceptability of the management actions required for ecosystem restoration.

In 2002 the National Park Service and the U.S. Geological Survey completed a large-scale research initiative designed to assess the role of elk and other factors (e.g., hydrology, climate, forage competition, predation) in influencing ecosystem conditions. Numerous investigators conducted 13 interdisciplinary yet integrated studies using both field study and computer modeling approaches.

Results suggest the current elk population is larger and more concentrated than would be expected under natural conditions. The field studies show that willows (Salix spp.) have declined on the core elk winter range because of a variety of factors, including intense foraging by elk and changes in water flow and levels related to large declines in beaver. Model results predict that further shifts from biologically diverse willow and aspen communities to less diverse grasslands will occur if elk browsing is not reduced. The model also predicts that restoring natural conditions will require a combination of long-term, intensive management actions to redistribute and reduce elk numbers, restrict elk access to willow and aspen communities, and restore hydrologic conditions. The research results provide the strong scientific basis that will be critical to making and successfully implementing management decisions in the future. Rocky Mountain is developing an Elk and Vegetation Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement in cooperation with other agencies responsible for land and wildlife management in the region.

Scientific Information for Management, Other Developments, Elk effects and management considerations studied at Rocky Mountain
Contact Authors
previous next
Nature Net NPS.gov privacy e-mail editor

last updated 4/14/2004

National Park Service, US Department of the Interior, Natural Resource Program Center, Natural Resource Information Division
Arrowhead symbol of the National Park Service

therese_johnson@nps.gov
Biologist, Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado

Get Acrobat Reader Download PDF