
FINLEY-HOLIDAY/RODNEY CAMAUFF, PHOTOGRAPHER
Figure 1. Costumed interpretation (above) and ranger-led walks (below) are among the interpretive activities that visitors to Great Smoky Mountains National Park described as important to their park visit.
Live interpretive programs at national parks serve multiple functions (fig. 1, above and below). They help to reveal to park visitors the deeper meanings associated with parks’ cultural and natural resources (Ham 1992; Tilden 1977). They can enhance visitors’ enjoyment by providing entertaining experiences or better orientation to the available sights, resources, and activities (Moscardo 1999). They can effect emotional connections to landscapes, to animal or plant life, and to the history being interpreted (Tilden 1977). They can influence visitors’ attitudes to the park they are visiting, toward the National Park Service, or toward an ecosystem, a historical event, a social movement, or the environment or nature in general (e.g., Powell et al. 2009). Research and theory also suggest that interpretation can influence visitors’ behaviors both during their visits and after they have left the park (Ham 2009).

FINLEY-HOLIDAY/RODNEY CAMAUFF, PHOTOGRAPHER
In conjunction with a study designed to learn why visitors attend (or do not attend) ranger-led interpretive programs at Great Smoky Mountains National Park, we set out to address three additional research questions that provide the focus of this report:
• How many visitors attend a ranger-led interpretive program? While general visitor surveys conducted by the Park Studies Unit at the University of Idaho typically ask visitors whether they have attended a ranger-led interpretive program on the particular visit during which they were contacted by the survey team, we sought to find out how many visitors had attended a program in the park when multiple visits are considered.
• How do visitors feel about ranger-led interpretive programs, regardless of their attendance? We sought to understand how visitors value the existence of ranger-led interpretive programs as well as their opinions of programs they had attended.
• What impacts do ranger-led interpretive programs appear to have on attendees? We gauged program impacts on a number of attitudes and intentions relevant to park management.
Stern, M. J., R. B. Powell, and C. Cook. 2011. Research Report: The benefits of live interpretive programs to Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Park Science 27(3):62–66.
Available at http://www.nature.nps.gov/ParkScience/archive/PDF/Article_PDFs/ParkScience27(3)Winter2010-2011_62-66_Stern_et_al_2764.pdf.