Masthead banner of Park Science: Integrating Research and Resource Management in the National Parks; ISSN 1090-9966; link to current issue
Volume 22
Number 2
Fall 2004
Arrowhead symbol of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior
Home + About + Author Guidelines + Archive + Subscribe +  
[Map]. Approximate number of exotic and transplanted native fish taxa by drainages (USGS 4-digit hydrologic unit code). Includes established and non-established introductions. CREDIT: AFTER FULLER ET AL. 1999 Under water and out of sight: Invasive fishes in the United States
Implications for national parks
By Walter R. Courtenay, Jr., and Pam L. Fuller
Published: 15 Jan 2014 (online)  •  30 Jan 2014 (in print)
Pages
 
Abstract
  Introduction
Pathways of introductions
Reasons for concern
Who regulates introductions?
The “bottom line” for the National Park Service
Acknowledgments
Literature cited
About the authors
+ PDF +
Introduction

The National Park Service (NPS) has been concerned with introductions of nonnative (foreign and domestic transplants) species in park areas since 1933 (Dennis 1980). Such introductions were recognized then as potential threats to maintaining areas under NPS jurisdiction as undisturbed as possible. Most activities since then to remove, reduce, or control introduced species in the National Park System have targeted terrestrial species, with only limited focus on aquatic organisms.

Shortly after Yellowstone was established as the first national park in 1872, the U.S. fish commissioner assigned an ichthyologist to assess it for native fishes and advise what nonnative fishes should be introduced for angling purposes (Jordan 1891). For many decades thereafter, NPS policy was to stock nonnative fishes in many national park units for sport fishing. The policy was challenged in the 1940s (Hubbs 1940, Hubbs and Wallis 1948, Hubbs and Lagler 1949) and later (Miller 1963) when sport fishes were recognized as a threat to native fishes in the national parks. What was unimagined then was that nonnative fishes introduced outside park boundaries would invade shared waters as new introduction pathways evolved. For example, visitors to Everglades National Park, Florida, taking time to look into water at Anhinga Trail now see more fishes from Africa, Central and South America, and Asia than native fishes.

In 1989 Courtenay reported at least 20 species of exotic (foreign) fishes known or reported to be established as reproducing populations in waters within or bordering units of the National Park System. That number did not include fishes native to the United States that had been transplanted and became established beyond their native ranges of distribution. Had U.S. transplants been included, the total number of nonnative fishes within or near the national parks would have been vastly higher. The National Park Service maintains a database of nonnative fishes in natural resource parks based on voluntary park input that presently includes 118 species of which 33 are exotics (James T. Tilmant, personal communication, 2003). The data suggest the probability that no national parks are without introduced fishes (fig. 1).

Fuller et al. (1999) reported nonnative fishes as having been introduced to all 50 states, with 536 taxa found beyond their native ranges (fig. 2). Although many failed to become established, those fishes came from all continents, including North America, except Antarctica.

Return to top

This page updated:  29 October 2006
URL: http://www.nature.nps.gov/ParkScience/index.cfm?ArticleID=120&Page=1



Page 1 of 8 • Next +
Departments
 
From the Guest Editor(s)
Information Crossfile
Book Reviews
Highlights
Short Features
Meetings of Interest
Masthead Information
FEATURES
 
The challenge of effectively addressing the threat of invasive species to the National Park System
A retrospective on NPS invasive species policy and management
Assessing the invasive species issue
The role of fire and fire management in the invasion of nonnative plants in California
Invasions in the sea
  Under water and out of sight: Invasive fishes in the United States
Ecological effects of animal introductions at Channel Islands National Park
Hemlock woolly adelgid and the disintegration of eastern hemlock ecosystems
Related Publications + Explore Nature + NPS.gov + Privacy + Disclaimer + Contact Editor
Web Site Last Updated: 17 January 2014